Another Secret Signing

Cybersecurity Bill Suffers Another Defeat – Obama Signs Secret Directive


Desperate Senate leaders eager for control of the internet, brought the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 back to the Senate floor for a vote Wednesday, and once again they failed.  It was just a couple of votes shy of passing (51-47),  but one vote closer than when it was presented back in August (52-46).

Immediately following the August vote, the word was out that Barack Obama was considering an executive order to put in place  the very thing the Senate had rejected.  In addition, part of the reason was  additional things tossed into the cybersecurity bill, such as bits of gun  control.

However, the rumors of an Obama executive order then came to be fact as White  House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said, “An executive order is one of a  number of measures we’re considering as we look to implement the president’s  direction to do absolutely everything we can to better protect our nation  against today’s cyber threats.”

Then, within a month Department of Homeland Security Janet “Big Sis” Napolitano testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and  Governmental Affairs that a cybersecurity executive order was indeed near  completion.

It seems that following the elections that Democrats were eager to push this  bill through.  Even the fear mongering of Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta  warning of a cyber “Pearl Harbor” or “9-11″ was not enough to advance the bill.   So the remaining option seems to be for Obama to just sign a piece of paper that  has no Constitutional authority to push what the people have rejected.

Many have stood against the government’s involvement in controlling the  internet including Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul.

According to The Hill, Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) “warned that the president would be compelled to issue the  executive order if the Senate voted against moving the bill forward. But he noted that the cyber order would not accomplish everything that legislation could, including liability protection that would safeguard companies from legal action if they’re hit by a cyberattack.”

“I’m confident that if we fail to act, the president will act,” Lieberman  said. “I think he has a responsibility to act because if we don’t we’re leaving  the American people extremely vulnerable to a cybersecurity attack.”

Lieberman was the one  that first introduced the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act in 2010 which was dubbed the Internet Kill Switch bill.

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) said, “Frankly, the underlying bill is not supported by the business community for all the right reasons.  They’re the ones that are going to be called to comply with the mandates and the regulations, and frankly it’s just not going to give them the protection they need against cyberattacks.”

In addition to Chambliss, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) shot back at claims by Democrats that Republicans were threatening national security for not favoring the bill, saying, “disagreements over how to address policy matters  shouldn’t evolve into accusations about a member’s willingness to tackle the  issue.”

However, The Washington Post reports that Obama signed a secret cybersecurity directive back in mid-October:  Presidential Policy Directive  20:

Presidential Policy Directive 20 establishes a broad and strict set of  standards to guide the operations of federal agencies in confronting threats in  cyberspace, according to several U.S. officials who have seen the classified  document and are not authorized to speak on the record. The president signed it  in mid-October.

The new directive is the most extensive White House effort to date to wrestle with what constitutes an “offensive” and a “defensive” action in the rapidly evolving world of cyberwar and cyberterrorism, where an attack can be launched in milliseconds by unknown assailants utilizing a circuitous route. For the first time, the directive explicitly makes a distinction between network defense and cyber-operations to guide officials charged with making often-rapid decisions when confronted with threats.

Since the cybersecurity bill has faced defeat twice this year and since we  are approaching a new year when people are not paying attention, sort of like  they weren’t last year when Barack Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with its section on “indefinite detention,” I would not  put it past this administration to wait till sometime around New Year’s and sign  his cybersecurity executive order.  Then all of the usual fluff pieces about the  holidays and record sales will end up dwarfing his undermining of the  Constitution and our liberties.  I’ll keep you posted…


About thecommonconstitutionalist

Brent is not a scholar. He’s not an author or speaker (yet). He hasn’t published a book nor does he write articles for magazines (yet). He has no advanced literary degree or pedigree (never will). He is just an American who writes and shares what interests him. He cares about the salvation of this country and a return to its Constitutional roots. He believes in God, country and family.
This entry was posted in Business, Current Events, Political Stuff and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Another Secret Signing

  1. forlibertysake says:

    Thanks for standing for our Constitution and the common wealth of liberty! Please consider reviewing my material on Constitutional matters as well.

    For Liberty Sake,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s